News

Spend any time on a factory floor and you can see the skill that keeps production moving. People adjusting settings by feel, noticing when a line sounds slightly different, or spotting small quality issues long before they escalate. That craft is still central to food manufacturing. But the sites making the biggest strides in efficiency, consistency and sustainability are the ones pairing that experience with something quieter. They’re treating data as seriously as they treat ingredients, raw materials and equipment.

For years, manufacturers tried to improve by looking outward. New machines, new automation and bigger investments. Exciting stuff. But the biggest gains often come from understanding what is already happening inside existing lines. Many operations carry hidden losses that slip beneath the noise of the day. Small pauses that no one notices. There’s rework that never gets properly logged, ingredient variances that add up across a shift, and  energy wasted in stop–start cycles. These micro-inefficiencies shape performance far more than a single breakdown ever will.

Every product that moves through a factory leaves a digital trail, even if the business isn’t capturing it. Line speeds, stops under a minute, temperature fluctuations, operator adjustments, waste levels, idle equipment. When these patterns become visible, teams often discover that tens of thousands of pounds are disappearing into gaps no one realised were there.

At one major confectionery manufacturer, for example, data captured within minutes of installation revealed that a high-volume line was stopping roughly every fifteen minutes. The pauses were short enough to be forgotten, yet over time they pulled speeds down and masked deeper issues. Once the team could see the pattern clearly, they lifted OEE by around five percent in just two months and paid back the project in under a year. The machines stayed the same. What changed was how they approached decision making.

These small insights matter because food manufacturing is finely balanced. A few seconds here or a handful of grams there seem inconsequential, but across continuous production they become the difference between stable margins and rising costs.

Traditionally, problems surfaced only when product quality slipped. Real-time data turns that reactive cycle into something calmer and more controlled. Teams can see when a line is drifting before the product suffers. It might be a mixer slowing slightly, a wrapper that judders more than usual, or an oven idling longer between runs. Early signals allow early fixes.

This doesn’t replace the judgement of skilled operators. It supports it. Data gives teams the confidence to act sooner and stops small deviations from becoming expensive waste.

AI in food manufacturing no longer sits in the realm of R&D presentations. It is quietly becoming part of day-to-day operations. Models now learn from historic production patterns and highlight relationships that would otherwise stay invisible. What we’re seeing is yield swings linked to ambient conditions. Waste spikes tied to specific materials. Lines behaving differently across shifts.

At Tip Top Bakeries, part of AB Foods, teams began by digitising paper checks using OFS Flow. Once these digital workflows were in place, AI tools could interrogate the data alongside production information, surfacing correlations and patterns that helped the site improve material yields and reduce losses. It gave operators and team leaders a clearer understanding of where to focus each day without adding to their workload.

The value isn’t in replacing expertise. It’s in giving teams clearer context for the decisions they already make and empowering them to use the data at hand.

Manufacturers are under growing pressure to demonstrate how they are cutting waste, saving energy and lowering emissions. Scope 1 and 2 reporting requirements are tightening. Retailers want more transparency from their supply line, and further down the chain consumers expect stronger environmental commitments.

Yet sustainability improvements rarely come from grand gestures. They come from the cumulative effect of hundreds of small decisions across shifts, such as shorter changeovers, fewer restarts, tighter temperature control and better sequencing of batches to reduce clean-down cycles. All of these rely on reliable information rather than memory or guesswork.

The sites that have embraced real-time visibility often find that sustainability becomes more manageable. They waste less, rework less and use less energy because they are not fighting blind.

There is a misconception in parts of the industry that more data means more complexity. The opposite is usually true. The level of complexity depends on how the data is collected, reported and visualised. When routine information is captured automatically, operators spend less time on paperwork and more time on quality, process and problem-solving. Investigations become simpler at the same time as audits become calmer and communication improves. The result is that teams feel more in control because they can see what is happening rather than relying on fragmented records. An independent, single source of truth builds trust and enables teams to focus their time and resources on improvement actions.

Digitisation at multinational food businesses such as Aryzta has shown this clearly. When the company digitised more than 100 paper checks at one site, investigations became faster, duplicate checks were eliminated and analysis went from days to minutes. Staff engagement rose because people no longer had to rely on memory to do the checks or understand what happened on the floor. Decisions could be based on facts, not frustration.

The biggest shift across food manufacturing today isn’t about new kit or headline-grabbing innovation. It’s about understanding the equipment, processes and people that are already there. It’s about spotting the small patterns that shape performance. It’s about making daily decisions with clarity rather than intuition alone.

Data won’t replace the skill that drives food production. It won’t shape dough, calibrate seasoning or judge texture. But it will help teams act faster, waste less and run more consistently. In an industry facing volatile costs, sustainability pressure and rising expectations, that makes it one of the most important ingredients on the line.